Sunday, September 13, 2026

Prescience

 Margaret Bourke-WhiteHalfway to Freedom  A Report on the New India, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1949.


Pakistan was one month old. Karachi was its mushrooming capital. On the sandy fringes of the city an enormous tent colony had grown up to house the influx of minor government officials. There was only one major government official, Mohamed Ali Jinnah, and there was no need for Jinnah to take to a tent. The huge marble and sandstone Government House, vacated by British officialdom, was waiting. The Quaid-i-Azam moved in, with his sister, Fatima, as hostess. Mr. Jinnah had put on what his critics called his “triple crown”: he had made himself Governor-General; he was retaining the presidency of the Muslim League — now Pakistan’s only political party; and he was president of the country’s lawmaking body, the Constituent Assembly.

“We never expected to get it so soon,” Miss Fatima said when I called. “We never expected to get it in our lifetimes.”

If Fatima’s reaction was a glow of family pride, her brother’s was a fever of ecstasy. Jinnah’s deep-sunk eyes were pinpoints of excitement. His whole manner indicated that an almost overwhelming exaltation was racing through his veins. I had murmured some words of congratulation on his achievement in creating the world’s largest Islamic nation.

“Oh, it’s not just the largest Islamic nation. Pakistan is the fifth-largest nation in the world!”

The note of personal triumph was so unmistakable that I wondered how much thought he gave to the human cost: more Muslim lives had been sacrificed to create the new Muslim homeland than America, for example, had lost during the entire Second World War I hoped he had a constructive plan for the seventy million citizens of Pakistan. What kind of constitution did he intend to draw up?

 ***

 What plans did he have for the industrial development of the country? Did he hope to enlist technical or financial assistance from America?

“America needs Pakistan more than Pakistan needs America,” was Jinnah’s reply. “Pakistan is the pivot of the world, as we are placed” — he revolved his long forefinger in bony circles — “the frontier on which the future position of the world revolves.” He leaned toward me, dropping his voice to a confidential note. “Russia,” confided Mr. Jinnah “is not so very far away.”

I wondered whether the Quaid-i-Azam considered his new state only as an armoured buffer between opposing major powers. He was stressing America’s military interest in other parts of the world. “America is now awakened,” he said with a satisfied smile. Since the United States was now bolstering up Greece and Turkey, she should be much more interested in pouring money and arms into Pakistan. “If Russia walks in here,” he concluded, “the whole world is menaced.”

In the weeks to come I was to hear the Quaid-i-Azam’s thesis echoed by government officials throughout Pakistan. “Surely America will build up our army,” they would say to me. “Surely America will give us loans to keep Russia from walking in.” But when I asked whether there were any signs of Russian infiltration, they would reply almost sadly, as though sorry not to be able to make more of the argument. “No, Russia has shown no signs of being interested in Pakistan.”

This hope of tapping the U. S. Treasury was voiced so persistently that one wondered whether the purpose was to bolster the world against Bolshevism or to bolster Pakistan’s own uncertain position as a new political entity. Actually, I think, it was more nearly related to the even more significant bankruptcy of ideas in the new Muslim state — a nation drawing its spurious warmth from the embers of an antique religious fanaticism, fanned into a new blaze.

Jinnah’s most frequently used technique in the struggle for his new nation had been the playing of opponent against opponent. Evidently this technique was now to be extended into foreign policy. ….

 ***

 Jinnah revived the moribund Muslim League in 1936 after it had dragged through an anemic thirty years’ existence, and took to the religious soapbox. He began dinning into the ears of millions of Muslims the claim that they were downtrodden solely because of Hindu domination.

During the years directly preceding this move on his part, an unprecedented degree of unity had developed between Muslims and Hindus in their struggle for independence from the British Raj. The British feared this unity, and used their divide-and-rule tactics to disrupt it. Certain highly placed Indians also feared unity, dreading a popular movement which would threaten their special position. Then another decisive factor arose. Although Hindus had always been ahead of Muslims in the industrial sphere, the great Muslim feudal landlords now had aspirations toward industry. From these wealthy Muslims, who resented the well-established Hindu competition, Jinnah drew his powerful supporters.

One wonders whether Jinnah was fighting to free downtrodden Muslims from domination or merely to gain an earmarked area, free from competition, for this small and wealthy clan.

The trend of events in Pakistan would support the theory that Jinnah carried the banner of the Muslim landed aristocracy, rather than that of the Muslim masses he claimed to champion. There was no hint of personal material gain in this. Jinnah was known to be personally incorruptible. The drive for personal wealth played no part in his politics. It was a drive for power. ..

 ***

 With his burning devotion to his separate Islamic nation, Jinnah had taken all these formidable obstacles in his stride. But the blow that finally broke his spirit struck at the very name of Pakistan. While the literal meaning of the name is “Land of the Pure,” the word is a compound of initial letters of the Muslim majority provinces which Jinnah had expected to incorporate: P for the Punjab, A for the Afghans’ area on the Northwest Frontier, S for Sind, -tan for Baluchistan. But the K was missing.

Kashmir, India’s largest princely state, despite its 77 per cent Muslim population, had not fallen into the arms of Pakistan by the sheer weight of religious majority. Kashmir had acceded to India, and although it was now the scene of an undeclared war between the two nations, the fitting of the K into Pakistan was left in doubt. With the beginning of this torturing anxiety over Kashmir, the Quaid-i-Azam’s siege of bad colds began, and then his dismaying withdrawal into himself. ….

Later, reflecting on what I had seen, I decided that this desperation was due to causes far deeper than anxiety over Pakistan’s territorial and economic difficulties. I think that the tortured appearance of Mr. Jinnah was an indication that, in these final months of his life, he was adding up his own balance sheet. Analytical, brilliant, and no bigot, he knew what he had done.

Like Doctor Faustus, he had made a bargain from which he could never be free. During the heat of the struggle he had been willing to call on all the devilish forces of superstition, and now that his new nation had been achieved the bigots were in the position of authority. The leaders of orthodoxy and a few “old families” had the final word and, to perpetuate their power, were seeing to it that the people were held in the deadening grip of religious superstition.


Wednesday, July 1, 2026

Pakistan's Indus Identity and a Refutation by AI (Gemini)

 This book is essentially about the peoples inhabiting the Indus and its tributaries. It is a land that is referred to here either as ‘Indus’ or the ‘Indus region’, depending upon the context. These terms are meant to identify the geographical extent of the land and to distinguish it, at the same time, from ‘India’,  the remainder of the subcontinent.

....
.... 
During the last six thousand years Indus has, indeed, remained independent of and separate from India for almost five and a half thousand years. Only the three ‘Universal States’, those of the Mauryans, the Mughals, and the British, welded these two regions together in single empires. And the aggregate period of these  ‘Universal States’ was not more than five hundred years. For the remainder, from prehistory to the nineteenth century, Indus has been Pakistan. 1947 was only a reassertion of that reality.  It was the reuniting of the various units, the Frontier, the Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan, and Kashmir once again in a primordial federation.  The mohajirs, who reverted to the Indus in 1947 and thereafter, were the sons and daughters returning to the mother.  As such, ‘Pakistan’ preceded even the advent of Islam in the subcontinent. It has deeper more ancient foundations. It need not, therefore, be structured as a fundamentalist intolerant Islamic polity.
Ahsan, Aitzaz. The Indus Saga and the Making of Pakistan (1996)


Question: If Jayadratha, King of Sindhu-desh was brother-in-law to the Kuru Duryodhana in the Mahabharata, how distinct does the Indus become from India?

Gemini replied thus:

Your point strikes right at the heart of the factual flaw in the "Indus vs. India" binary. By bringing up Jayadratha, you are highlighting a web of kinship, politics, and culture that ancient texts show spanned the entire subcontinent long before any "Universal State" conquered it.
When you look at the Mahabharata and the wider Vedic corpus factually and philologically, the idea of a sealed, separate 5,500-year-old Indus identity largely dissolves. Instead, what emerges is a complex, overlapping cultural continuum.

Here is how the relationship between the Indus (Sindhu) and the rest of the subcontinent actually functioned in antiquity:

1. The Kinship Network: Strategic Royal Alliances

In the geopolitical landscape of the epics, marriage alliances were the ultimate indicator of belonging to the same socio-political matrix.
The Marriage: Jayadratha, ruler of the Sindhu-Sauvira kingdom (modern Sindh and southern Punjab, the absolute core of the Indus basin), was married to Dushala, the only daughter of King Dhritarashtra and sister to Duryodhana.

The Implications: This wasn't a peripheral treaty; it was a top-tier alliance with the Kuru heartland of the Gangetic plain (Hastinapur/Kurukshetra). If the Indus region were a fundamentally distinct, alien civilization, the Kuru royals would not have integrated the ruler of Sindhu into the immediate imperial family.

During the Kurukshetra War, Jayadratha doesn't fight as an external mercenary; he fights as a key stakeholder on the Kaurava side, anchoring their strategic defense on the 14th day of the war. The epic treats the Indus plains and the Gangetic plains as part of the same geopolitical mandala (network of kingdoms).

2. The Historical Irony of the "Sapta Sindhu"

The thesis that "Indus has been Pakistan, separate from India" completely ignores the foundational geography of early Indo-Aryan culture.
The Rigveda, the oldest text in the Indo-Aryan tradition and the ultimate bedrock of what evolved into "Indian" culture, was composed almost entirely within the Indus basin. It praises the Sapta Sindhu (the Land of the Seven Rivers)—the Indus and its tributaries.

The cultural evolution didn't happen in two separate silos:

Phase 1 (The Indus Basin): The early Vedic people lived, composed hymns, and established their early social structures along the Indus.

Phase 2 (The Gangetic Shift): Over centuries, as iron tools allowed them to clear denser forests, the cultural center of gravity shifted east into the Yamuna-Ganga doab (the Kuru-Panchala region).

Therefore, the Gangetic plain ("India" in the excerpt's binary) and the Indus basin share the exact same cultural DNA. The Indus wasn't a separate entity; it was the cradle of the very culture that later flourished in the east.

3. The "Borderland" Nuance: Friction, Not Separation

To be factually precise, ancient texts do recognize that the Indus region was distinct—but as a frontier region within a shared cultural sphere, not an independent civilization.

As the orthodox Vedic culture solidified in the Gangetic heartland, the people of the Northwest (the Indus basin, Madra, and Bahlika) began to be viewed by the easterners as slightly unorthodox or "lax" in their rituals and social customs.

A famous example occurs in the Karna Parva of the Mahabharata, where Karna and Shalya (the King of Madra, in the Punjab/Indus system) engage in a bitter shouting match. Karna insults the customs of Shalya’s homeland, calling them impure and negligent of strict Vedic rites.

However, this friction is typical of the relationship between an orthodox cultural center (the Gangetic plain) and its wilder, trade-heavy frontier (the Indus valley, which was constantly exposed to migrations and foreign influences from Central Asia and Persia). It represents regional variation and cultural anxiety, not civilizational separation.

The Verdict

When the excerpt claims that "For the remainder... Indus has been Pakistan," it applies a modern, Westphalian concept of nation-state borders to antiquity.

In the era of the Mahabharata, the Indus was factually integrated into the subcontinent through shared language, shared foundational texts, and elite marital alliances like that of Jayadratha and Dushala. It was the western anchor of a singular, deeply interconnected cultural landscape. 

China and Bactria in the Mahabharata

 The epic, Mahabharata, in describing that great prehistoric civil war not only unquestioningly assumes the ‘oneness’ of the vast subcontinent, but also looks upon the lands of Bactria and China, beyond its great mountain ranges, as outlying frontier regions, inseparable, inalienable, and natural parts of the Indian subcontinent.


Ahsan, Aitzaz. The Indus Saga and the Making of Pakistan (1996)

This is wrong. In the Mahabharata,  Bactria and China are treated as foreign lands inhabited by outsiders to the Vedic culture.


 

Sunday, June 28, 2026

Chaudhry Rehmat Ali - Pakistan at the Dawn of History

 

Pakistan at the dawn of history

Chaudhry Rehmat Ali, Pakistan, The Fatherland of the Pak Nation, Third Edition, 1946

Saturday, May 10, 2025

Supremacy

Muhammad Mohsin Iqbal in The Friday Times, April 25, 2025 https://thefridaytimes.com/25-Apr-2025/india-s-actions-and-pakistan-s-response-peace-with-strength
The Pakistani nation, along with its brave armed forces, is made up of resilient, courageous, and self-sacrificing people. In times of national crisis, the entire nation becomes united like a clenched fist. The passion with which Pakistan responds to aggression transforms every child into a soldier. Our people do not fear death—in fact, the Muslim spirit considers martyrdom an honor and a divine reward. This belief grants the nation a spiritual and moral strength that no adversary can match. It is this superior will and unshakeable determination that makes us distinct from India, and this distinction will remain until the end of time.

Wednesday, January 1, 2020

What this blog is about

(Jan 12, 2011): Adding matters of Indian and Pakistani history to this blog.